Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "Fisher, Victor" <Victor-Fisher@******.COM>
Subject: Re: [SR] I'm new. Very new. Very new indeed....
Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 11:48:37 -0400
Neil wrote [boy, did he write :-]:
<snip>
>How many people would be required for a fun game?

As little as 2, to as many as 10, but if you're a beginning GM,
though, I wouldn't try to handle anything more than 4. Find out what
your players would like to do, and what kind of story you'd like to run,
and go from there. If the players don't care for your story, they won't
get into it. And if the GM doesn't like the game he's running, well,
lets just say, don't ever let the GM get bored with running. Things
could get real hazardous to the players. [Hint to your players: ALWAYS
placate the GM. Offerings of cupcakes and other goodies MAY sway the
'Gods' to grant you that extra Karma reroll when you're about to fall
off that 100 foot cliff, or be eaten by that hungry piasma that's just
come out of hibernation].
Don't worry too much if things get 'out of hand'. Almost
everybody's first game tends to stray into the 'Outer Limits' of
munchkinism. As you get a feel for the rules and the setting, things
will start to make more sense to you and your players on what the
'proper' power levels should be [unless they're Power Gamers, in which
case NO amount of explaining is going to change how they see anything
:-].
If you're players enjoy what you do, size doesn't matter.
And if you get to the point where nobody's enjoying what they're
doing, STOP. Take a step back, a deep breath, and when everybody's
feeling that spark again, get into it again. Never forget, the whole
point is to have FUN.

Musings of a WAY too old GM :-]



> And, welcome to the board!

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about [SR] I'm new. Very new. Very new indeed...., you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.