Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: David Hayes rook@***.net
Subject: SR Movies List (BOOK SPOILER)
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 12:37:19 -0800
From: Shaun E. Gilroy <shaung@**********.net>
Subject: Re: SR Movies List


<snip>
>Doesn't mean he -is- doesn't mean he -isn't-. It means he might be.
It
>means: "believe what you want this to mean."
>
>I've Read a lot of PKD and I, personally don't believe Deckard to be a
>replicant (that is if the movie was attempting to live up to "Philip K.
>Dick's vision").
>
> *noysh turns to go back into the temple of kipple-worship*
>
>Anyway, I like the Director's Cut version, it allows the near-future
>dystopian flavor permeate the movie a lot better, which is the kind of
>thing that led me into Shadowrun in the first place.

spoiler space for new balde runner books

S
P
O
I
L
E
R

S
P
A
C
E

good enough, not as if many people would read them i think.

have you read K.W. Jeter's <i think that's him> newer books "edge of
human" and "replicant night"?
in the first one, right at the end, deckard meets up with a guy who says
that he is the original deckard, and that the cop deckard is a
replicant. haven't read the second one yet. the 'original' is some kind
of military guy and it looks like he is a rebel against some corp or
government. can't say for sure, been a while since i read it and it's in
storage.
of course, this is someone else's vision of the blade runner story, and
not philip dick's.


-----------------------------------------------
k. david hayes aka rook
rook@***.net
http://www.members.cnx.net/rook/
http://www.angelfire.com/ns/masquerade/
pages best viewed with IE 4.x or better
-----------------------------------------------
managing editor
ouc phoenix, kelowna b.c.
phoenix@******.okanagan.bc.ca
-----------------------------------------------

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about SR Movies List (BOOK SPOILER), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.