Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Philip Hayward <Philip.Hayward@***.UK>
Subject: Re: Starting o
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 1995 13:44:45 -0000
Jani Fikouras wrote:

> I see the logic in this, but I personally dont agree with it. After all
> runners are supposed to be the crem de la crem (sp?), if they dont have that
> 6 in firearms who does? What I think is missing here is something I picked up
> in rec.games.frp.advocacy, its called social competence (I think its from
> GURPS - dunno never played it) An all around skill for things like chess
> playing, singing, baseball, amateur programming, foo, bar. Things that
> normal people have and would make the characters a lot more believable.
> The problem is that if you charge them as normal skills nobody will
> waist precious skill points to get them.
>

I thought about something like this, skills mainly for 'Hobbies'
useful to give a background feel to characters. Rather than buying these
skills with karma, they are only improved with time, since the runners
insist on spending a few weeks between runs, enjoying their most recent
earnings, acquiring new equipment etc.. ask them to work out what how
they spend their time. If your lying low for a month your going to need
something to occupy your time. I give 1 to 2 points per week outside
runs, depending what else they do.

So now the entire team has Cards (Poker) 4 / 8

well it was a start,

Now, players being players will then insist that they can improve normal
skills this way, but no I remained firm and the nearest I allowed was
to let let our rigger use them to increase her aircraft B/R
specialisation : aircraft B/R (Polishing), when she declared she spent
most of her time on maintenance for her Hughes Stallion

Phil
<Philip.Hayward@***.UK>

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Starting o, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.