Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: David Buehrer <dbuehrer@****.ORG>
Subject: Sticking up for Mike
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 09:05:19 -0700
Michael Broadwater wrote:
|
| Man, one post nailing a guy for bugging people about asking for
| constructive criticism, and suddenly, I'm the bad guy again. Apparently,
| the list doesn't believe in forgive and forget. Guess I'll just have to
| change your collective mind.

I can't speak for others, but there was never anything to
forgive or forget. It just took me (and will probably take
others) a while to understand that you are a very
passionate person. And there's nothing wrong with that :)

MC23 seems to be every bit as passionate as your are. I'm
looking forward to reading debates between the two of you
:)

-David

/^\/^\/^\/^\/^\/^\/^\ dbuehrer@****.org /^\/^\/^\/^\/^\/^\/^\
"His thoughts tumbled in his head, making and breaking
alliances like underpants in a dryer without Cling Free."
~~~http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/1068/homepage.htm~~~~
Message no. 2
From: MC23 <mc23@****.NET>
Subject: Re: Sticking up for Mike
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 13:22:26 -0500
David Buehrer wrote,
>I can't speak for others, but there was never anything to
>forgive or forget. It just took me (and will probably take
>others) a while to understand that you are a very
>passionate person. And there's nothing wrong with that :)
>
>MC23 seems to be every bit as passionate as your are. I'm
>looking forward to reading debates between the two of you
>:)
>
>-David
If that is true then you may be the only one left who reads our
posts. A lot of people are completely ignoring what I say. B;>]#

- MC23, "Can you say Killfile? I knew you could." -





Ancient cultures believed that names held great power, personal
names more so and they were guarded very closely. To protect themselves,
they answered to another name, because if another discovered their real
name, it could be used against them.
History repeats itself.
Welcome to the Digital Age.
I am MC23
Message no. 3
From: John E Pederson <lobo1@****.COM>
Subject: Re: Sticking up for Mike
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 14:48:05 EST
On Fri, 10 Jan 1997 13:22:26 -0500 MC23 <mc23@****.NET> writes:
>David Buehrer wrote,
>>I can't speak for others, but there was never anything to
>>forgive or forget. It just took me (and will probably take
>>others) a while to understand that you are a very
>>passionate person. And there's nothing wrong with that :)
>>
>>MC23 seems to be every bit as passionate as your are. I'm
>>looking forward to reading debates between the two of you
>>:)
>>
>>-David
> If that is true then you may be the only one left who reads our
>posts. A lot of people are completely ignoring what I say. B;>]#
>
>- MC23, "Can you say Killfile? I knew you could." -

Hey! _I_ still read everything...'course my mailer doesn't have filiters,
but that's beside the point:)

Canthros-the-shapeshifter-mage
Message no. 4
From: MC23 <mc23@****.NET>
Subject: Re: Sticking up for Mike
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 15:48:37 -0500
John E Pederson wrote,
>Hey! _I_ still read everything...'course my mailer doesn't have filiters,
>but that's beside the point:)
>
>Canthros-the-shapeshifter-mage
>
That's two. Should this Mickey Mouse Rolecall continue so I can find
out how many haven't killfiled me.

I wish I could find the original quote but since I can't I'll
paraphrase

If I had just one Amendment from the Bill of Rights I would have the
First Amendment, and with that one I would win back all the others!

- MC23, panting heavily after such a strong display of passion -
"Huh, who's this Lochost guy that keeps calling me?"
Message no. 5
From: Calvin Hsieh <u2172778@*******.ACSU.UNSW.EDU.AU>
Subject: Re: Sticking up for Mike
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 1997 10:27:24 +1100
On Fri, 10 Jan 1997, MC23 wrote:

SNIP

> If that is true then you may be the only one left who reads our
> posts. A lot of people are completely ignoring what I say. B;>]#

Nah, I stuck on.

Shaman
Message no. 6
From: Tim Cooper <tpcooper@***.CSUPOMONA.EDU>
Subject: Re: Sticking up for Mike
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 18:27:27 -0800
On Fri, 10 Jan 1997, MC23 wrote:

> John E Pederson wrote,
> >Hey! _I_ still read everything...'course my mailer doesn't have filiters,
> >but that's beside the point:)
> >
> >Canthros-the-shapeshifter-mage
> >
> That's two. Should this Mickey Mouse Rolecall continue so I can find
> out how many haven't killfiled me.
>

Are you REALLY that insecure? :) I mean, who really cares whether or not
people read your every post? If you post something that people feel like
responding to, then they'll respond.. if not, well, who the hell cares?

(and I'm using the word 'you' in that all inclusive,
refers-to-you-me-and-anybody-who-reads-this sence..)

>
> - MC23, panting heavily after such a strong display of passion -
> "Huh, who's this Lochost guy that keeps calling me?"
>

~Tim
<positive that NO ONE hangs on my every word>
Message no. 7
From: Spike <u5a77@*****.CS.KEELE.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: Sticking up for Mike
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 1997 12:07:20 +0000
| That's two. Should this Mickey Mouse Rolecall continue so I can find
|out how many haven't killfiled me.

I HAVE!!! I killfiled you.....

Errrr. Why am I reading this? Oh yeh....

(Didn't really....)

--
______________________________________________________________________________
|u5a77@*****.cs.keele.ac.uk| "Are you pondering what I'm pondering Pinky?" |
|Andrew Halliwell | |
|Principal subjects in:- | "I think so brain, but this time, you control |
|Comp Sci & Electronics | the Encounter suit, and I'll do the voice..." |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|GCv3.1 GCS/EL>$ d---(dpu) s+/- a- C++ U N++ K- w-- M+/++ PS+++ PE- Y t+ 5++ |
|X+/++ R+ tv+ b+ D G e>PhD h/h+ !r! !y-|I can't say F**K either now! >*SULK*<|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Sticking up for Mike, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!