Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: honken101@********.net (Fredrik Holmqvist)
Subject: Stress Clarification?
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 11:09:06 +0200
Hey dudes!

Here comes another question. When you check for stress, it states that that
you should compare to the damage done. Is that the damage before or after
the Damage Resistance Test?



/Honken
Message no. 2
From: gurth@******.nl (Gurth)
Subject: Stress Clarification?
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 11:55:02 +0200
According to Fredrik Holmqvist, on Monday 19 July 2004 11:09 the word on
the street was...

> Here comes another question. When you check for stress, it states that
> that you should compare to the damage done. Is that the damage before or
> after the Damage Resistance Test?

AFAIK it's the damage done by only the most recent attack. So if you have 2
boxes of damage and take another Serious, the TN would be 6, and not 8.

--
Gurth@******.nl - Stone Age: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
... in real life, which was styled after the film.
-> Probably NAGEE Editor * ShadowRN GridSec * Triangle Virtuoso <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://plastic.dumpshock.com <-

GC3.12: GAT/! d- s:- !a>? C++(---) UL+ P(+) L++ E W--(++) N o? K w(--)
O V? PS+ PE@ Y PGP- t- 5++ X(+) R+++$ tv+(++) b++@ DI- D+ G+ e h! !r y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998
Message no. 3
From: datwinkdaddy@*******.com (Da Twink Daddy)
Subject: Stress Clarification?
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 08:09:59 -0500
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 11:09:06 +0200, Fredrik Holmqvist
<honken101@********.net> wrote:

> Here comes another question. When you check for stress, it states that
> that you should compare to the damage done. Is that the damage before or
> after the Damage Resistance Test?

After.

--
Da Twink Daddy
ICQ: 514984; YM: DaTwinkDaddy
datwinkdaddy@*******.com

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Stress Clarification?, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!