Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Tim Kerby drekhead@***.net
Subject: Success?
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 14:01:59 -0500
Looks like I made it... :)

So, what's up over here?

--

================================================================ - Tim Kerby -
|"Letter writing is the only
- drekhead@***.net - | device for combining
HTML to: drekhead@********.net | solitude and good company."
ICQ - UIN 2883757 | -Lord Byron
Message no. 2
From: Lehlan Decker DeckerL@******.com
Subject: Success?
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 14:06:00 -0500
A bunch of us being OT, and asking what's going on? What did
you expect.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lehlan Decker, Unix Admin (704)331-1149
deckerl@******.com Fax 378-1939
Moore & Van Allen, PLLC Pager 1-888-608-9633
Message no. 3
From: Ojaste,James [NCR] James.Ojaste@**.GC.CA
Subject: Success?
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 14:11:04 -0500
Tim Kerby wrote:
> Looks like I made it... :)
>
> So, what's up over here?
>
Not much. Mostly just hanging around wondering what's happening... :-)

James Ojaste
Message no. 4
From: Tony Glinka porthos@*******.com
Subject: Success?
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 12:17:54 -0700
Lehlan Decker wrote:
>
> A bunch of us being OT, and asking what's going on? What did
> you expect.
>

You realize what kind of trouble Bull could have over here? :) OT which
is allowed and almost desirable? But then again maybe being legal would
take all the fun out of it. :)

Tony
--
Porthos@*******.com -- GridSec: SRCard
Porthos' World of Shadowrun: http://www.inficad.com/~porthos/sr/
Tony's SRTCG Site: http://www.inficad.com/~porthos/srtcg/
Home of the SRTCG Q&A: SRCard's Official Unofficial SRTCG FAQ
Message no. 5
From: Lehlan Decker DeckerL@******.com
Subject: Success?
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 14:20:42 -0500
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lehlan Decker, Unix Admin (704)331-1149
deckerl@******.com Fax 378-1939
Moore & Van Allen, PLLC Pager 1-888-608-9633

>>> Tony Glinka <porthos@*******.com> 01/29/99 02:17pm >>>

>You realize what kind of trouble Bull could have over here? :) OT
>which is allowed and almost desirable? But then again maybe
>being legal would take all the fun out of it. :)

Heh..your right. Sorta like that whole sex and marriage thing. :)
(Runs, ducks, and realizes Gurth's stairs aren't here yet!)
Message no. 6
From: MC23 mc23@**********.com
Subject: Success?
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 99 14:29:53 -0500
Once upon a time, Tim Kerby wrote;

>Looks like I made it... :)
>
>So, what's up over here?

Listening to Echos


<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Ancient cultures believed that names held great power, personal names
more so and they were guarded very closely. To protect themselves, they
answered to another name, because if another discovered their real name,
it could be used against them.
History repeats itself.
Welcome to the Digital Age.
I am MC23
Message no. 7
From: Lehlan Decker DeckerL@******.com
Subject: Success?
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 14:31:12 -0500
>Listening to Echos

Nah..that's just the sound bouncing off the inside of our skulls.
You can ignore it. :)
Good to see you MC, haven't seen you at the game in a dogs age.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lehlan Decker, Unix Admin (704)331-1149
deckerl@******.com Fax 378-1939
Moore & Van Allen, PLLC Pager 1-888-608-9633
Message no. 8
From: ArcLight arclight@**************.com
Subject: Success?
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 22:04:41 +0100
> -----Original Message-----
> From: shadowrn-admin@*****.html.com
> [mailto:shadowrn-admin@*****.html.com]On Behalf Of Lehlan Decker
> Sent: Friday, January 29, 1999 8:21 PM
> To: shadowrn@*****.html.com
> Subject: Re: Success?

<snip>

> Heh..your right. Sorta like that whole sex and marriage thing. :)
> (Runs, ducks, and realizes Gurth's stairs aren't here yet!)

Really? Hmh, can't help for this one, I think

ArcLight
ICQ 14322211
NO ONE IS SAFE FROM A MICROWAVE
Message no. 9
From: Gurth gurth@******.nl
Subject: Success?
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 13:20:17 +0100
According to Lehlan Decker, at 14:20 on 29 Jan 99, the word on
the street was...

> (Runs, ducks, and realizes Gurth's stairs aren't here yet!)

Hey, I joined this list yesterday but didn't have time to read it until
now (gotta play SR and sleep, you know :) -- but they've arrived now!

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
And that's as far as the conversation went.
-> NERPS Project Leader * ShadowRN GridSec * Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
->The Plastic Warriors Page: http://shadowrun.html.com/plasticwarriors/<-
-> The New Character Mortuary: http://www.electricferret.com/mortuary/ <-

GC3.1: GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+
PE Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998
Message no. 10
From: Gurth gurth@******.nl
Subject: Success?
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 13:20:16 +0100
According to Tony Glinka, at 12:17 on 29 Jan 99, the word on
the street was...

> You realize what kind of trouble Bull could have over here? :) OT which
> is allowed and almost desirable? But then again maybe being legal would
> take all the fun out of it. :)

Looks like David's idea has been put into practice after all, even if it's
only to test the new list :)

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
And that's as far as the conversation went.
-> NERPS Project Leader * ShadowRN GridSec * Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
->The Plastic Warriors Page: http://shadowrun.html.com/plasticwarriors/<-
-> The New Character Mortuary: http://www.electricferret.com/mortuary/ <-

GC3.1: GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+
PE Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Success?, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!