Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Simon J. Berger simonjberger@*****.se
Subject: SV: chipjacks and expert drivers
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 16:15:18 +0200
(I'm new to this list; hope I'm welcome anyway:)

The way I see it, NOT limiting the total number of Pool Dice is simply not
an option. I figure the meaning of the rules is that you don't have any use
for help beyond a certain level, depending on your natural skill. Thusly, if
you have a Skill Value of 4, you can't get more than four extra dice on a
single action using that skill, no matter how many different Dice Polls and
Task Pools you have.

Anything else would be very strange, I think.

/Simon J. Berger

----------
>Från: Mark Abbott <markabbott@****.com>
>Till: shadowrn@*********.com
>Ämne: Re: chipjacks and expert drivers
>Datum: tis 27 jun 2000 15.54
>

>>
>> Maybe because those skills are generally under-used anyhow, especially
>>by the kind of cyber-hardcase who would sink 2 essence worth of cyber into
>>using skillsofts? Adepts get a similarly potent boost to some of those
>>skills, and mages can often do similarly well on those tasks with their
>>spells, so this level of ability itself is not really new.
>> The potential flexibility is certainly newly impressive, and if it
>>actually DISPLACES all normal use of those skills, its maybe a problem. It
>>doesn't seem it generally does so, though. <Shrug>
>
> Interesting, thanks for the opinion. I DO like limiting total pool
> dice, no matter what pool they're drawn from. I suspect that one
> will end up in our game whatever our GMs decide about the CED.
>
> Mark
>
>
>
>

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about SV: chipjacks and expert drivers, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.