Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: jkoke@****.edu (Jak Koke)
Subject: test and ADMIN: digest?
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 1995 11:15:17 -0800
I seem to be getting the list. Are the list commands the same as before,
and if so, what is the address for set commands to be sent? I much prefer
getting the messages in digest form.

Thanks.

--Jak

Also, in response to the concern that no one at FASA monitors the list.
While this is true at the moment because of some personnel shifting, and
because Mike Mulvihill just doesn't have time, I am in contact with Mike on
a regular (at least once a week) basis. I scan this list and have been
keeping him (and other SR authors) aware of the general sentiments
expressed here.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Jak Koke | jkoke@****.edu
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Message no. 2
From: dbuehrer@****.org (David Buehrer)
Subject: Re: test and ADMIN: digest?
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 1995 11:39:30 -0700 (MST)
| I seem to be getting the list. Are the list commands the same as before,
| and if so, what is the address for set commands to be sent? I much prefer
| getting the messages in digest form.

listproc@********.itribe.net type help as the subject for the list of
commands available. Hope that helps :)

David

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
David Buehrer
Data Entry Supervisor
The UnCover Company email: dbuehrer@****.org
3801 E. Florida, Suite 200 Voice: (303) 758-3030 x132
Denver, CO 80210 FAX: (303) 758-5946

"The land that had nourished him and had borne him fruit now turned against
him and called him a fruit. Man, I hate land like that."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about test and ADMIN: digest?, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.