Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Chameleon <cham@***.BIGPOND.NET.AU>
Subject: Testing new e-mail client
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1998 08:52:44 GMT
Sorry for posting this to the list, I'm just testing a new e-mail
client and am hoping that it works better then M$OE didn't.
Chameleon,

I'm Always Here, You Just Don't See Me
Message no. 2
From: Spike <u5a77@*****.CS.KEELE.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: Testing new e-mail client
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1998 14:25:17 +0100
And verily, did Chameleon hastily scribble thusly...
|
|Sorry for posting this to the list, I'm just testing a new e-mail
|client and am hoping that it works better then M$OE didn't.
|Chameleon,
|
|I'm Always Here, You Just Don't See Me
|

I see you....
Something must be working properly...
Not even any silly V-cards or binary attachments.
Congratulations.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|u5a77@*****.cs.keele.ac.uk| Windows95 (noun): 32 bit extensions and a |
| | graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit |
| Andrew Halliwell | operating system originally coded for a 4 bit |
| Finalist in:- |microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that|
| Computer Science | can't stand 1 bit of competition. |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|GCv3.1 GCS/EL>$ d---(dpu) s+/- a- C++ U N++ o+ K- w-- M+/++ PS+++ PE- Y t+ |
|5++ X+/++ R+ tv+ b+ D G e>PhD h/h+ !r! !y-|I can't say F**K either now! :( |
Message no. 3
From: Chrome Tiger <chrome@********.ORG>
Subject: Re: Testing new e-mail client
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1998 12:19:51 -0400
>I see you....
>Something must be working properly...
>Not even any silly V-cards or binary attachments.
>Congratulations.


Gee, I use MS Outlook Express and get no such things.

CT

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Testing new e-mail client, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!