Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Ereskanti@***.com Ereskanti@***.com
Subject: The Price of (Hermetic) Power
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 1999 15:42:19 EST
In a message dated 4/2/1999 9:03:32 AM US Eastern Standard Time,
zadoc@***.neu.edu writes:

> > Then, there's thens of thousands of NY spent on their libraries - gotta
> > have sorcery, conjuring, etc.
>
> Well, okay. This is always expensive, but, usually a one-shot deal. Under
> 2nd Ed, I always bought my libraries with all my extra starting cash. In
> 3rd, it gives mages something to buy.
>
<snipped some stuff>

> > If you can't keep a Hermetic broke - you're either giving out too much
> > money or you need to watch your player's bookkeeping more closely. ;)
>
> Or, tell them no Enchanting. Or come up with more costs. It's really not
> too hard to be a Hermetic, without spending lots of money.

Actually, there is a way to consider keeping your Hermetic Magicians down (if
that is what you want). SOTA does cover magical stuff, and the Library is
the rating that SOTA effects in a direct manner. And damn, does *that* get
expensive rather quickly.

Additionally, with regards to Enchanting, there is always a beginning or base
cost of the raw materials (as measured in money or time ... not too mention
the cost of the Enchanting Gear/Shop). Additionally, outside of Foci, the
real money maker in Enchanting is Alchemy, and that has some very
time-restrictive elements that is involved in it. There are lots of options,
yes, but there are also lots of very important, very paper-tracking-intensive
considerations as well.

-K

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about The Price of (Hermetic) Power, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.