Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Kevin Langevin <kevinl@******.COM>
Subject: The Shadowrun Archive...
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 1998 11:02:38 -0500
...looks fantastic...one note, however...the link that supposedly sends mail
to all 8 developer's doesn't work. :)

Other than that, I'm amazed. It was definitely worth the wait.

-Kev
Message no. 2
From: Adam J <adamj@*********.HTML.COM>
Subject: Re: The Shadowrun Archive...
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 1998 10:47:26 -0700
At 11:02 12/5/98 -0500, Kevin Langevin wrote:
>...looks fantastic...one note, however...the link that supposedly sends mail
>to all 8 developer's doesn't work. :)

Whoops! (I had two typo's in it. It was a last minute addition to the
site.. :) )

>Other than that, I'm amazed. It was definitely worth the wait.

<Sighs of relief are heard at Adams house>

-Adam
--
< http://shadowrun.html.com/tss / adamj@*********.html.com >
< ShadowRN Assistant Fearless Leader / TSA Co-Admin / ICQ# 2350330 >
< FreeRPG & Shadowrun Webring Co-Admin / The Shadowrun Supplemental >
< ShadowFAQ: http://shadowrun.html.com/shadowfaq >
Message no. 3
From: K in the Shadows <Ereskanti@***.COM>
Subject: Re: The Shadowrun Archive...
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 1998 14:26:35 EST
In a message dated 12/5/1998 12:44:30 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
adamj@*********.HTML.COM writes:

>
> >Other than that, I'm amazed. It was definitely worth the wait.
>
>
I'll be nice and say I am impressed. However...a NOTE to the all the AOL
Visitors...

Apparently there are some problems between AOL's ability to web browse and the
new site, so have a LOT of patience if the images do NOT want to load the
first time (or four) around.

Use the right mouse button on the images and things will work out really well.
Things for me work just fine now :)

-K

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about The Shadowrun Archive..., you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.