Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Adam J <adamj@*********.HTML.COM>
Subject: The Shadowrun Supplemental #9 & 10
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 1998 02:53:29 -0600
Just a quick note and a question --

TSS-09 is due when it's ready :) This will be sometime after my site goes
back online and I get the necessary time to compile the issue and get it
all online. Probably a few more weeks at best.

Now, who would be interested in seeing issue #10 be a series of articles
about SR3? We've seen a *lot* of optional rules and revised stuff passed
around already, and it would be nice to compile as much of it as possible
and cram it into one magazine, and it could prove very useful, IMO. Any
thoughts on this?

-Adam J
--
< TSS Productions down - New URL Soon! / adamj@*********.html.com >
< ShadowRN Assistant Fearless Leader / TSA Co-Admin / ICQ# 2350330 >
< FreeRPG & Shadowrun Webring Co-Admin / The Shadowrun Supplemental >
< "Raven loves me! He just bought me a new rubber ducky!" - Lodi >
< TSS : ftp://thor.flashpt.com/pub/srun/ShadowrunSupplemental/pdf >
Message no. 2
From: K in the Shadows <Ereskanti@***.COM>
Subject: Re: The Shadowrun Supplemental #9 & 10
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 1998 04:58:18 EDT
In a message dated 9/19/1998 3:55:43 AM US Eastern Standard Time,
adamj@*********.HTML.COM writes:

>
> Now, who would be interested in seeing issue #10 be a series of articles
> about SR3? We've seen a *lot* of optional rules and revised stuff passed
> around already, and it would be nice to compile as much of it as possible
> and cram it into one magazine, and it could prove very useful, IMO. Any
> thoughts on this?
>
I for one would like to see it yes, but I would NOT want to be the poor guy
who gets to build it up.

-K
Message no. 3
From: Patrick Goodman <remo@***.NET>
Subject: Re: The Shadowrun Supplemental #9 & 10
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 1998 10:33:04 -0500
From: Adam J <adamj@*********.HTML.COM>
Date: Saturday, September 19, 1998 3:54 AM

>Now, who would be interested in seeing issue #10 be a series of articles
>about SR3? We've seen a *lot* of optional rules and revised stuff passed
>around already, and it would be nice to compile as much of it as possible
>and cram it into one magazine, and it could prove very useful, IMO. Any
>thoughts on this?

Works for me. I'm in the middle of an article about SR3 at the moment, so
it would certainly fit in with my plans.... <g>

--
(>) Texas 2-Step
El Paso: Never surrender. Never forget. Never forgive.
Message no. 4
From: "D. Ghost" <dghost@****.COM>
Subject: Re: The Shadowrun Supplemental #9 & 10
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 1998 16:42:31 -0500
On Sat, 19 Sep 1998 02:53:29 -0600 Adam J <adamj@*********.HTML.COM>
writes:
>Now, who would be interested in seeing issue #10 be a series of articles
>about SR3? We've seen a *lot* of optional rules and revised stuff
passed
>around already, and it would be nice to compile as much of it as
possible
>and cram it into one magazine, and it could prove very useful, IMO. Any
>thoughts on this?

this might be interesting ... what kinds of articles do you have in mind?
(Ie, what about SR3?)

How will this impact what you were already planning on putting TSS-10?

--
D. Ghost
(aka Pixel, Tantrum, RuPixel)
o/` I traded my Flesh for a Fantasy and now my truck broke down, my wife
left me, and my dog died o/` -- Billy Idol, Jr. Rock Country Singer

_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
Message no. 5
From: Adam J <adamj@*********.HTML.COM>
Subject: Re: The Shadowrun Supplemental #9 & 10
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 1998 16:08:02 -0600
At 16:42 9/19/98 -0500, D. Ghost wrote

>this might be interesting ... what kinds of articles do you have in mind?
>(Ie, what about SR3?)

The optional/expanded stuff that some people have already worked on. For
example, the Smartlinks article that I'm workign on would go well in it, as
well as things like the optional Melee rules that were posted a few days back.

>How will this impact what you were already planning on putting TSS-10?

I hadn't planned anything for #10 yet, but I thought this would be a good
time to fish for ideas and see if we could get the issue done sooner than a
couple months after #9.

-Adam J
--
< TSS Productions down - New URL Soon! / adamj@*********.html.com >
< ShadowRN Assistant Fearless Leader / TSA Co-Admin / ICQ# 2350330 >
< FreeRPG & Shadowrun Webring Co-Admin / The Shadowrun Supplemental >
< "Raven loves me! He just bought me a new rubber ducky!" - Lodi >
< TSS : ftp://thor.flashpt.com/pub/srun/ShadowrunSupplemental/pdf >
Message no. 6
From: Steadfast <laughingman@*******.DE>
Subject: Re: The Shadowrun Supplemental #9 & 10
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 1998 00:31:04 +0200
And so it came to happen that AdamJ wrote:
----------
<snip>
> Now, who would be interested in seeing issue #10 be a series of articles
> about SR3? We've seen a *lot* of optional rules and revised stuff passed
> around already, and it would be nice to compile as much of it as possible
> and cram it into one magazine, and it could prove very useful, IMO. Any
> thoughts on this?

Would be great. It could be of some help if there were some notes in it
regarding "old" rules, for example the max. ROF or some of the other that
the guys at FASA missed. Not such as a "Now it is so, and such it is
written" but may so as "there in SR2 it was like". OTH maybe too much work
for you all. Well its an idea.

--->Steadfast
to be "human" is not a state of living
I want to achieve.
Message no. 7
From: System Administrator <Wells@*************.COM>
Subject: Re: The Shadowrun Supplemental #9 & 10
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1998 10:40:41 -0500
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------ =_NextPart_001_01BDE7D1.B487C13E
Content-Type: text/plain

It was whispered in the darkest parts of the bar:
>>
>> Now, who would be interested in seeing issue #10 be a series
of articles
>> about SR3? We've seen a *lot* of optional rules and revised
stuff passed
>> around already, and it would be nice to compile as much of
it as possible
>> and cram it into one magazine, and it could prove very
useful, IMO. Any
>> thoughts on this?
>>
> I for one would like to see it yes, but I would NOT want to be
the poor guy
> who gets to build it up.

I second that motion. Waitress a round for everyone.


------ =_NextPart_001_01BDE7D1.B487C13E
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; =
charset=us-ascii">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.1960.3">
<TITLE>RE: The Shadowrun Supplemental #9 &amp; 10</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<UL>
<P><FONT COLOR="#0000FF" SIZE=2
FACE="Arial">It was whispered in =
the darkest parts of the bar:</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR="#0000FF" SIZE=2
FACE="Arial">&gt;</FONT><FONT =
COLOR="#000000" SIZE=2
FACE="Arial">&gt;</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR="#0000FF" SIZE=2
FACE="Arial">&gt;</FONT><FONT =
COLOR="#000000" SIZE=2
FACE="Arial">&gt;&nbsp; Now, who would be =
interested in seeing issue #10 be a series of articles</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR="#0000FF" SIZE=2
FACE="Arial">&gt;</FONT><FONT =
COLOR="#000000" SIZE=2
FACE="Arial">&gt;&nbsp; about SR3?&nbsp; =
We've seen a *lot* of optional rules and revised stuff passed</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR="#0000FF" SIZE=2
FACE="Arial">&gt;</FONT><FONT =
COLOR="#000000" SIZE=2
FACE="Arial">&gt;&nbsp; around already, =
and it would be nice to compile as much of it as possible</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR="#0000FF" SIZE=2
FACE="Arial">&gt;</FONT><FONT =
COLOR="#000000" SIZE=2
FACE="Arial">&gt;&nbsp; and cram it into =
one magazine, and it could prove very useful, IMO.&nbsp; Any</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR="#0000FF" SIZE=2
FACE="Arial">&gt;</FONT><FONT =
COLOR="#000000" SIZE=2
FACE="Arial">&gt;&nbsp; thoughts on =
this?</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR="#0000FF" SIZE=2
FACE="Arial">&gt;</FONT><FONT =
COLOR="#000000" SIZE=2
FACE="Arial">&gt;</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR="#0000FF" SIZE=2
FACE="Arial">&gt;</FONT> <FONT =
COLOR="#000000" SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">I for one would
like to see =
it yes, but I would NOT want to be the poor guy</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR="#0000FF" SIZE=2
FACE="Arial">&gt;</FONT> <FONT =
COLOR="#000000" SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">who gets to
build it =
up.</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT COLOR="#0000FF" SIZE=2
FACE="Arial">I second that =
motion. Waitress a round for everyone.</FONT>
</P>
</UL>
</BODY>
</HTML>
------ =_NextPart_001_01BDE7D1.B487C13E--
Message no. 8
From: Spike <u5a77@*****.CS.KEELE.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: The Shadowrun Supplemental #9 & 10
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 17:41:03 +0100
And verily, did System Administrator hastily scribble thusly...
|
|This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
|this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
|
|------ =_NextPart_001_01BDE7D1.B487C13E
|Content-Type: text/plain

<SNIP!>

Right. You were told, by gridsec, to sort out your mailer problems on
Tuesday. This was posted on thursday, and it's STILL knackered.

Will the person known as "System Administrator", who doesn't even appear to
know how to configure a mailer, let alone a system, please....

COME ON DOWN!

Yes Mr Administrator, you have won tonights star prize!
A full seafood dinner.


##### # # # # ## #####
# # # # # # # # #
# ###### # # # # # #
# # # # ## # ###### #####
# # # ## ## # # #
# # # # # # # #


--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|u5a77@*****.cs.keele.ac.uk| Windows95 (noun): 32 bit extensions and a |
| | graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit |
| Andrew Halliwell | operating system originally coded for a 4 bit |
| Finalist in:- |microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that|
| Computer Science | can't stand 1 bit of competition. |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|GCv3.1 GCS/EL>$ d---(dpu) s+/- a- C++ U N++ o+ K- w-- M+/++ PS+++ PE- Y t+ |
|5++ X+/++ R+ tv+ b+ D G e>PhD h/h+ !r! !y-|I can't say F**K either now! :( |

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about The Shadowrun Supplemental #9 & 10, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!