Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: sp@*****.gr (Stefanos Patelis)
Subject: [to OT or not to OT?] PBEM adverts?
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 13:57:19 +0300
Greetings and apologies for the funny tag in the title...My question is
simple and the way I see it on the FAQs it is not against the rules but
something in the back of my mind made me ask first before posting....So:

Can we advertise any Shadowrun PBEM's we are starting on this list?

Thanks,
Stef

--
Πατέλης
ΣτέφαΜος

EWORX S.A.
22 Rodou Street - Maroussi 15122 - Greece
tel: +30 210 61 48 380, +30 210 61 48 360
mob: +30 6978853066 - fax +30 210 6148381
mailto:sp@*****.gr -- http://www.eworx.gr
Message no. 2
From: gurth@******.nl (Gurth)
Subject: [to OT or not to OT?] PBEM adverts?
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 13:01:13 +0200
According to Stefanos Patelis, on 12-8-05 12:57 the word on the street
was...

> Can we advertise any Shadowrun PBEM's we are starting on this list?

I don't see why not. As long as it's not commercial, advertising has
never really been banned around here -- saying "I'm starting a PBEM, and
I'm looking for players" is not really much different from saying "I've
put together this program/website/net.book, please check it out".

--
Gurth@******.nl - Stone Age: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
de limme
-> Possibly NAGEE Editor & ShadowRN GridSec * Triangle Virtuoso <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Site: http://plastic.dumpshock.com <-

GC3.12: GAT/! d- s:- !a>? C++(---) UB+ P(+) L++ E W++(--) N o? K w-- O
M+ PS+ PE@ Y PGP- t- 5++ X(+) R+++$ tv+(++) b++@ DI- D G+ e h! !r y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about [to OT or not to OT?] PBEM adverts?, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.