Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Gurth <jweste%smtp@******.HZEELAND.NL>
Subject: Two questions... (SMTP Id#: 448) - Reply
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 1994 10:15:22 +0100
> First, one of my players wants to have a physical adept with
>boosted reflexes and also wants to take increased reflexes as one of his
>adept powers. This would give him 4d6 + 8 for initative. I looked
>everywhere I could for something about this in the rules, but I couldn't
>find a thing.
>I'm inclined to give it to him because boosted is a treatment of the
>body's nervous system & not a piece of cyber. Opinions?

IMHO, it is cyberware, because it has an Essence cost, so make him lose
Magic Points for the cyberware. If he still has enough left to buy
Increased Reflexes, you can treat it as the equivalent of an Increase
Reflexes spell (p.155 of SRII), which is not cumulative with cybered
initiative dice. In any case, you're the GM, so it's your call.

> Second, another of my players just wants to have a cyberleg from
>the knee down. He reasons that a full cyberleg is attached at the hip
>and that because he only wants a fractional cyberleg he should only pay
>half of the essence. Any ideas?

Why not? A full cyberleg (or arm) costs 1 point of Essence, so why not
make half a leg cost .5? Half legs do exist (see the last story in the
Into The Shadows novel), so you could give it to him. Maybe you could
increase the Essence cost of a half leg a bit, maybe to .6 or something,
making up some reason like the interface between the leg and the body
requires the extra Essence.



+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+ Gurth + I'm buried up to my neck in +
+ (jweste%smtp@******.hzeeland.nl) + contradictionary flies +
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Two questions... (SMTP Id#: 448), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.