Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: andre eibel <eibel.andre@**.COMCITY.DE>
Subject: Various topics
Date: Thu, 22 May 1997 15:00:12 -0500
Here I`m again

1) Gurth`s posting about npc`s and karma/dice pools
In our game we had make these long ago and it gives the poor fraggers a
change and
spiceses up the npc for the higher up pc`s.

We use the threat rating as karma pool and calculate the other pools per
standart rules.

2) Etiquette rules

We go as follows: general etittquette is not a skill every etiquette is a
cons. and must be
learned as a new skill. At character creation you get the skill at 1 point
higher as you
paid for( hey its a con. )

3) Totems

My favored Totems are Phoenix for the beauty and the pyromanic in me
and Mantis for the coolness when you see the freight in everyones eyes

ok thats it for now folks.


Barbie
Message no. 2
From: Mark Steedman <M.J.Steedman@***.RGU.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: Various topics
Date: Thu, 22 May 1997 16:31:45 GMT
andre eibel writes
>
> 1) Gurth`s posting about npc`s and karma/dice pools
> We use the threat rating as karma pool and calculate the other pools per
> standart rules.
I have also taken to giving groups of opponents a team karma pool on
occasion, works wonders especially when they don't argue over who
gets to use it and the PC's do over theirs :)

> 2) Etiquette rules
>
> We go as follows: general etittquette is not a skill every etiquette is a
> cons. and must be learned as a new skill. At character creation
> you get the skill at 1 point higher as you paid for( hey its a con.
Likewise but see the recent thread on this over the chat i had on
this subject, it is not the only way to read the rules though it is
my prefered method.

Mark

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Various topics, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!