From: | Max Rible <slothman@*********.ORG> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Vegetarian Elves [was re: Queen Alachia] |
Date: | Mon, 28 Sep 1998 11:37:34 -0700 |
>Max Rible wrote:
>> Because there's a rather good fossil record tracing the evolution
>> of humanity, and there's an amazing lack of people with tusks or
>> other metahuman features. Elves in particular I don't believe
>> evolved, because they're obligate vegetarians, which requires them
>> to be post-Neolithic Revolution, which occurred about 10000 BC.
>While I agree with most of your post, I've found nothing to suggest to me
>that elves really are "obligate vegetarians." Certainly, there is the
>reference in SR1 and 2, but SR3 seems to take a slightly different tack.
It's stated pretty clearly in the section on Elves in SR2 that they
are vegetarians-- not herbivores, not omnivores, but vegetarians.
Of course, that portion of the entry on Elves seems to be one of the
least-read sections of SR2, right along with the bit on what happens
when metahumans interbreed, judging from what I've seen on the Net.
I don't recall SR3 mentioning anything one way or the other.
Anyone have an SR2 handy to quote from? I'm at work right now...
--
%% Max Rible %%% max@********.com %%% http://www.amurgsval.org/~slothman/ %%
%% "Ham is good... Glowing *tattooed* ham is *bad*!" - the Tick %%