Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject: Re: Vehicle Storage Requirements + Turret question
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 1998 11:23:38 +0100
According to Mike Bobroff, at 16:15 on 26 Nov 98, the word on
the street was...

> > Why a seperate formula for vehicle and drones? The only difference
> > between drones
>
> The reason I chose to have different formula is because the design of a drone
> and a manned vehicle are different. A manned vehicle has space added into it
> to take into account people and the things that they do while within a vehicle
> (like move around and such), whereas in a drone you don't need to worry about
> some of those things.

Doesn't the 6 CF needed for a bucket seat take care of that space? Drones
don't have seats, but they also don't spend the CF needed for them, so it
balances out in the end IMO.

> > That would make the zepplin & mini-blimp 403/109 CF and 2/2 CF (see
> > format note above), respectively.
>
> True, a zeppelin could be collapsed, but it would also take a frag of a long
> time to put back together again too.

Zeppelins cannot readily be collapsed, I feel -- a zeppelin is an airship
with a rigid metal framework to which gas bags are attached; the outer
shell is really only there for streamlining. Blimps are, IIRC, more like
inflated balloons, with the pressure inside keeping them in the shape
they're supposed to be. IOW, I feel a blimb could be folded up, but a
zeppelin would either have to be dismantled and then re-build, or designed
with a collapsable structure (which would add a _lot_ to the cost).


On a slightly related subject, I was trying to add a popup turret to my
character's Toyota Elite, and I noticed a very weird formula for the
turret's Availability on page 135 of Rigger 2: "([Vehicle Cost / 25] / 6)
x (Vehicle Cost / 25) x 14 = days required to obtain parts". Note that all
the slashes here are division signs (a line with a dot above and below
it).

Now with an Elite, costing 125,000 nuyen, this formula gives a result of:

([125,000 / 25] / 6) x (125,000 / 25) x 14
(5000 / 6) x 5000 x 14
833.3 x 5000 x 14
58,333,333

I don't know about you, but I'm not going to wait 160 millennia for a
turret to become available :)

And even if we assume it should be "([Vehicle Cost / 25] / 6) x (Vehicle
Cost / 25) / 14 days" with the last slash being a slash, the TN to obtain
a turret for an Elite would still be 4,166,667, but the highest I've ever
seen anyone roll in Shadowrun is in the mid-40s, not the low 40-millions.

Then shifting the slash one more position to the left, to give an
Availability TN of ([Vehicle Cost / 25] / 6) and a base time of (Vehicle
Cost / 25) x 14 days it's still ridiculous -- TN 833.3, base time 70,000
days...

Either there's a typo there somewhere that I can't seem to find, or the
whole formula is wrong. Which is it?

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
Stay in.
-> NERPS Project Leader * ShadowRN GridSec * Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-
-> The New Character Mortuary: http://www.electricferret.com/mortuary/ <-

GC3.1: GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+
PE Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Vehicle Storage Requirements + Turret question, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.