Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "Logan Graves <Fenris>" <logan1@*****.INTERCOM.NET>
Subject: Viewing words while astral (was: Re: Manifestation
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 1997 18:51:01 -0500
In our last episode, Gurth wrote:
>
> In responce to Wilson Reis de Souza Neto's earlier post:
>
> > I'm almost sure i'm being stupid, but does a magician can manifest
> > while in astral space??????
>
> Only partially; you can make yourself seen and heard on the physical
> plane, but you can't touch anything there -- all the rules for being
> on the astral plane still apply (which IMHO means you can't read
> roadsigns by semi-manifesting this way).

True. But interestingly (and I believe you & I have been 'round this
one before ;-), you *can* pick up on the astral images of mundane
objects while in astralspace.
Such as the strong feelings within a book of poetry or the emotional
"charge" on a marriage certificate. Obviously, the original manuscripts
would 'radiate' more in A-space, than printed copies. Family heirlooms
or a favored security blanket would also have such a glow. But so would
shady business contracts or a signed confession from a serial killer
(actually the _abode_ of said killer would be quite a place, indeed, to
perceive astrally!!).
While you couldn't actually read or see these words, you could
attempt to gain (assense?) the meaning or feeling of the item. This is
also applicable to text displayed on a computer monitor, buy it is much
harder (the charge/image is quite a bit fainter).
This is, BTW, in the Grimmy. But mine isn't unpacked, so no page
numbers this night. ;-p

--Fenris
_______________________________________________logan1@*****.intercom.net
(>) "It's true that I don't like you. But being
ordered to kill you is just a happy coincidence."
(>) --Sgt. Servo

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Viewing words while astral (was: Re: Manifestation, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.