From: | "Simon T. Sailer" <Simon.Sailer@****.AC.AT> |
---|---|
Subject: | VOTE RESULTS! (OT) |
Date: | Mon, 17 Mar 1997 19:08:30 +0100 |
Even if no one else is happy with it, I finally am.
First, my thanks go to all those who voted and/or sent me
nominations, especially to GRANITE.
Thats the way the votes arrived:
1 2 3
-------------------------------------------
Gurth 5 2 2
Blackjack 0 0 2
Granite 0 0 1
Sascha Pabst 0 0 1
Steven Tinner 0 0 3
Paolo Marcucci 1 4 0
Mike Mulvihill 5 3 0
Steve Kenson 0 0 1
Bull 2 2 0
(I know its not representative, but it could have been worse...)
So what does that mean-depends on how you rate it.
The system I had in mind gave 6 points for a first place, 3 points
for a second and 1 point for a third.
Calculated that way, the result looks as follows:
(1) *****Mike Mulvihill*****
(2) ****Gurth****
(3) ***Bull***
(3) ***Paolo Marcucci***
(4) **Steven Tinner**
(5) *Blackjack*
(6) # Granite&Sascha Pabst #
If somebody wonders why there are different numbers of votes for the
three ranks, well thats the way I got them-some votes were
incomplete. And Steve Kennson was not in the nominations, somebody
voted for him anyway. Why not?
So finally I'll be a ordinary listmember again...(hopefully)
ss