Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Matti Aistrich <aistrich@********.hkkk.fi>
Subject: Votes
Date: Fri, 3 May 1996 15:29:11 +0300 (EET DST)
On Mon, 15 Apr 1996 GLENN.ROBERTSON@***.Edu wrote:

> > I wonder whether they will really pay attention to the
> > votes cast, or just go ahead and let their own choice win.
>
> The game store where I picked up my copy said they were told that the
> votes really were gonna decide. Just my two bits.
>
Has FASA already announced their future publication schedule? Do they
have time to work in the results from the vote? If there's fiction
involved I doubt it... or they'll have to leave us hanging for a year or
two... :-)

---------------------------------------------
: Perfect is : Matti M. Aistrich :
: only just : :
: good enough! : aistrich@********.hkkk.fi :
---------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GB d+(++) s-:+ a- C+ W+ w PS+ PE++ Y+ t---
X- R++ tv+ b+ D++ G e++>+++ h-- y+++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Message no. 2
From: TopCat <topcat@******.net>
Subject: Re: Votes
Date: Fri, 3 May 1996 23:01:04 -0500
>Has FASA already announced their future publication schedule? Do they
>have time to work in the results from the vote? If there's fiction
>involved I doubt it... or they'll have to leave us hanging for a year or
>two... :-)

Check out the FASA web page, it has some info on that stuff.

http://www.fasa.com/

--------------------------------------------------------
* Bob Ooton -- <topcat@******.net> *
* Golden Tiger Association -- Submission Fighting Team *
--------------------------------------------------------
* All you need to start up an insane asylum is *
* an empty room and the right kind of people *
--------------------------------------------------------

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Votes, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.