Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: shadowrn@*********.com (Gurth)
Subject: Wanted: Reviewer(s)
Date: Mon Feb 5 14:00:03 2001
For the NAGEE (http://plastic.dumpshock.com/nagee), I'm looking for one or
more persons to act as staff reviewers of new and old products of interest
to Shadowrun players.

I know that this may be a strange moment to ask for reviewers, seeing as
how there will be very few SR products published by FASA anymore, however
(as can be seen in the requirements, below) it is my intention to review
not only SR products, but also those for other games -- and even non-game
materials -- that will be useful to Shadowrun players or gamemasters.

Basically, the reviewer(s) would have to:

* Have access to at least all new SR releases, and preferably most of the
older products as well (for comparison purposes in reviews)
* Have a good background in SR as well as gaming in general
* Have the ability to make good-quality scans (and/or digitized photographs)
of the products reviewed
* Not care about erratic deadlines :)

If you are interested, send a _private_ e-mail at <gurth@******.nl>.
Please explain why you're the one I want, and what your qualifications
are. I'm looking forward to hearing from you :)

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
My ocular organs!
-> NAGEE Editor * ShadowRN GridSec * Triangle Virtuoso <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://plastic.dumpshock.com <-

GC3.12: GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+@ UL P L++ E W-(++) N o? K w+(--) O V?
PS+ PE(-)(+) Y PGP- t@ 5++ X(+) R+++(-)>$ tv+ b++@ DI- D+ G+ e h! !r y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Wanted: Reviewer(s), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.