Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: runeweaver <runeweaver@********.NET>
Subject: What's so bad about deckers?
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1998 10:35:19 -0400
After listening to this decker thread for the past 10-15 messages I just
have to ask one question...What decker rules are you *using*? The rules
presented in VR2.0 and now in SR3 are *very* fast and easy to use. Do your
players have less then a 5min attn span? I'll admit that it takes a little
more work on the part of the GM to incorprate Deckers into a game (another
layer of security and such to design) but again the new rules make it
simple. All you need to do ahead of time is to write up a quick description
of the node and it's contents. The system is very different from the rules
included with SR2, as you don't have to mess with designing an absurd
little maze of system componets, the system is a single area, with links to
other hosts that are directly connected to it. Taking actions in the Matrix
is no more difficult then another player rolling to pick a lock or some
other such action, and I certainly don't here anyone complaining about
'regular' characters making skill tests: what's the difference? Deckers are
an intergral part of the cyberpunk genre, and in my almost humble opinion,
the game suffers greatly without them. Who wants a game full of carbon copy
warriors anyway?
-Adam Lydick
//note that I changed my FROM field to avoid confusion with the other AdamL
on the list ;-)
//Flames to me --- not the list!
Message no. 2
From: "Ubiratan P. Alberton" <ubiratan@**.HOMESHOPPING.COM.BR>
Subject: Re: What's so bad about deckers?
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1998 19:30:49 -0300
runeweaver wrote:

<snip>

I agree completely.

> -Adam Lydick
> //note that I changed my FROM field to avoid confusion with the other AdamL
> on the list ;-)
> //Flames to me --- not the list!

How many "Adams" do we have on this list :) ?

Bira
Message no. 3
From: Spike <u5a77@*****.CS.KEELE.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: What's so bad about deckers?
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1998 08:15:38 +0100
And verily, did Ubiratan P. Alberton hastily scribble thusly...
| How many "Adams" do we have on this list :) ?

I know. They seem to be multiplying.

HELP! HELP! We're being overrun by Adams!
The invasion is here!

:)
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|u5a77@*****.cs.keele.ac.uk| Windows95 (noun): 32 bit extensions and a |
| | graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit |
| Andrew Halliwell | operating system originally coded for a 4 bit |
| Finalist in:- |microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that|
| Computer Science | can't stand 1 bit of competition. |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|GCv3.1 GCS/EL>$ d---(dpu) s+/- a- C++ U N++ o+ K- w-- M+/++ PS+++ PE- Y t+ |
|5++ X+/++ R+ tv+ b+ D G e>PhD h/h+ !r! !y-|I can't say F**K either now! :( |
Message no. 4
From: Steve Collins <einan@*********.NET>
Subject: Re: What's so bad about deckers?
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1998 12:22:17 -0400
>And verily, did Ubiratan P. Alberton hastily scribble thusly...
>| How many "Adams" do we have on this list :) ?
>
>I know. They seem to be multiplying.
>
>HELP! HELP! We're being overrun by Adams!
>The invasion is here!

It's the Adams family !!!!!
Message no. 5
From: Adam Getchell <acgetchell@*******.EDU>
Subject: Re: What's so bad about deckers?
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1998 10:26:35 -0700
>HELP! HELP! We're being overrun by Adams!
>The invasion is here!

Is there a problem with that? ;-)

We were first, after all. ;-)

>:)
>| Andrew Halliwell | operating system originally coded for a 4 bit |

--Adam

acgetchell@*******.edu
"Invincibility is in oneself, vulnerability in the opponent." --Sun Tzu
Message no. 6
From: Brett Borger <bxb121@***.EDU>
Subject: Re: What's so bad about deckers?
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1998 13:28:07 EST
> >HELP! HELP! We're being overrun by Adams!
> >The invasion is here!
>
> Is there a problem with that? ;-)
>
> We were first, after all. ;-)
> --Adam

Ah! Biblical Arrogance! We should should all name ourselves "Eve",
so we can through the arrogance right back Adam...

-=SwiftEve=-
(Raise your hand if you didn't get the joke)
Message no. 7
From: Wiebke & Birger Timm <WiebkeT@********.DE>
Subject: Re: What's so bad about deckers?
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1998 22:59:59 +0200
Brett Borger wrote:

> > >HELP! HELP! We're being overrun by Adams!
> > >The invasion is here!
> >
> > Is there a problem with that? ;-)
> >
> > We were first, after all. ;-)
> > --Adam
>
> Ah! Biblical Arrogance! We should should all name ourselves "Eve",
> so we can through the arrogance right back Adam...

Wouldn't help much... Adam was there before Eve...

Blix
Message no. 8
From: "Ubiratan P. Alberton" <ubiratan@**.HOMESHOPPING.COM.BR>
Subject: Re: What's so bad about deckers?
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 20:28:30 -0300
Wiebke & Birger Timm wrote:
>
> Wouldn't help much... Adam was there before Eve...
>
> Blix


Curiosity... Men do have one rib less than women... :) .

Bira
Message no. 9
From: "M. Sean Martinez" <ElBandit@***.COM>
Subject: Re: What's so bad about deckers?
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 22:17:00 EDT
In a message dated 8/22/98 8:33:52 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
ubiratan@**.HOMESHOPPING.COM.BR writes:

> Curiosity... Men do have one rib less than women... :) .

Really?

-Bandit
Message no. 10
From: "Ubiratan P. Alberton" <ubiratan@**.HOMESHOPPING.COM.BR>
Subject: Re: What's so bad about deckers?
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 18:40:09 -0300
M. Sean Martinez wrote:
>
> In a message dated 8/22/98 8:33:52 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> ubiratan@**.HOMESHOPPING.COM.BR writes:
>
> > Curiosity... Men do have one rib less than women... :) .
>
> Really?
>
> -Bandit


Really. I had the opurtunity to count them.

Bira

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about What's so bad about deckers?, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.