Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "Lynn Twiss" <ltwiss@********.com>
Subject: Where is Tom Dowd?
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 1996 14:59:55 +0000
What happened to Tom?
Is working on any other projects at FASA?
Why did he leave SR?
I heard that he did not approve of the background count ruling. Is
this true? If it is true, what is the problem with it?

I know I ask to many questions but I was just wondering.





Lynn Twiss
Clackamas, Oregon

"There is no such thing as justice.
Only the desire to see the pain spred around
evenly."
-Soloman Short
Message no. 2
From: "Gurth" <gurth@******.nl>
Subject: Re: Where is Tom Dowd?
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 1996 12:28:32 +0100
Lynn Twiss said on 14:59/ 6 Oct 96...

> What happened to Tom?
> Is working on any other projects at FASA?
> Why did he leave SR?

>From what I know, he left the SR department to head a new multimedia
department FASA set up a couple of years ago.

> I heard that he did not approve of the background count ruling. Is
> this true? If it is true, what is the problem with it?

I've never heard of this, though as I tend to say, that doesn't mean it's
not true :) What I do know is that someone said recently that Paul Hume
had problems with the background count -- mainly, in that it's so easy to
get one in a location.

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
Everything looks better in black and white.
-> NERPS Project Leader & Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1:
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE
Y PGP- t(+) 5+ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Where is Tom Dowd?, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!