Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: The Vagabond <nomad74@*******.COM>
Subject: Re: Wolverine Shamans
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 09:08:48 PDT
>In a message dated 4/28/98 11:06:45 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
>nomad74@*******.COM writes:
>
>> Actually, it's not *that* much. Technically, a Cat shaman gets 8
>> dice, same as dog, same as shark, same as Wolf... all get 2 more
dice
>> starting out...
>>
>Uh, nope... Cat Gets 4 dice, Dog gets 4 dice, shark get's 4 dice...

Well, before I get into this arguement, my source was the list of
totems I used that contained the stats for Wolverine- shows you how
reliable it is. Now, on with the show...

>+2 Illusion/City Spirits[for Cat]

Granted.

>+2 Detection/Hearth Spirits[for Dog]

To quote you: "Uh, nope..." +2 for detection, +2 for field
spirits, +2 for hearth spirits. That's +6... just like Wolverine.

>+2 Combat/Sea Spirits[for Shark]

+2 for Combat, +2 for Detection, +2 for Sea Spirits = +6

>+2 Combat/Forest Spirits (usually)[for Wolf, I assume]

Second verse- same as the first! +2 for Combat, +2 for Detection, +2
for Forest or Pairie = +6

>
>sorry, that example bounced IMO.

Looks like we both are avid pracitioners of "selective reading".
In that case, any example would bounce, wouldn't it?
We'll consider this one a stalemate, since we were both wrong.
However, my point about having a +6D starting advantage not being that
big still stands. Especially if the character is prone to homicidal
fits of rage if his underwear is too tight.

-Vagabond
"Under wandering stars I've grown"
________________________________________________________
<nomad74@*******.com> <ICQ 4297972>


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Message no. 2
From: Ereskanti <Ereskanti@***.COM>
Subject: Re: Wolverine Shamans
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 21:31:57 EDT
In a message dated 4/29/98 11:35:26 AM US Eastern Standard Time,
nomad74@*******.COM writes:

> >+2 Detection/Hearth Spirits[for Dog]
>
> To quote you: "Uh, nope..." +2 for detection, +2 for field
> spirits, +2 for hearth spirits. That's +6... just like Wolverine.
>
Wow, that's new to me. I never remember Field Spirits being with Dog. Did
this change since First Ed?

The other screw ups I give in to. For some reason, I always forget Detection
Spells with Wolf and Shark (no one likes them enough sometimes it seems).

-K
Message no. 3
From: The Vagabond <nomad74@*******.COM>
Subject: Re: Wolverine Shamans
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 22:13:49 PDT
>> >+2 Detection/Hearth Spirits[for Dog]
>>
>> To quote you: "Uh, nope..." +2 for detection, +2 for field
>> spirits, +2 for hearth spirits. That's +6... just like Wolverine.
>>
>Wow, that's new to me. I never remember Field Spirits being with Dog.
Did
>this change since First Ed?

Nope. It's always been there.

>
>The other screw ups I give in to. For some reason, I always forget
Detection
>Spells with Wolf and Shark (no one likes them enough sometimes it
seems).

Your not the only one <g>.


-Vagabond
"Under wandering stars I've grown"
________________________________________________________
<nomad74@*******.com> <ICQ 4297972>


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Wolverine Shamans, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.