Message no. 1

From:	Dvixen Vidi Vici <dvixen@****.spydernet.com>
Subject:	Re: your mail (should have been GIZMOS et al)
Date:	Fri, 23 Aug 1996 11:23:58 -0700 (PDT)

On -1 xxx -1, it was written:
(This is new...)


[Received: stuff deleted]

> From: "Andre' Selmer" <031ANDRE@******.wits.ac.za>
> Organization: University of the Witwatersrand
> To: shadowrn@********.itribe.net
> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 1996 11:17:29 GMT + 2:00
> Subject: GIZMOS et al

[Rest of headers deleted]

Hey Andre', you using a new program, or did it hiccup somewhere between
you the list, and me?
This appeared in my mailbox as [No Message Text Available], but
everything was there.

> Here is an idea that I want to throw around. What would the
> minimum light requirement be for low light eyes to work. There reason
> being that my character came up with the following and in theory it
> should work. If one exposed some phosperous to the equivilent of a
> flash pak, then scattered the power, would that provide enought light
> for the low light eyes to work from? (I would generally assume that
> there is not enought light for normal eyes to work with.
>
> Andre'

I'd say it would be like normal eyes looking into a dusk shadow. You
could see some outlines, uzw, but as for reading the grafitti on the
wall...

--
AJ Schaafsma Dvixen@****.spydernet.com
This post in no way reflect the opinions of the myriad voices in my head.

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
V3.1 GSS d- s+:- a-- C++ W+ N++ w+(-) PS+ t+(--) fk++ 5++ X++ b+++ e+ r%
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------