| From: | EDU%"indavidr@****.EDU" "David Remington" 21-FEB-1992 06:12 |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: problem with the assault cannon... |
| Date: | Thu, 20 Feb 1992 14:38:26 CST |
06:12
To: Brett Barnhart <BARNHART@****.BITNET>
Subj: Re: problem with the assault cannon...
Received: From UICVM(MAILER) by KNOX with Jnet id 6402
for BARNHART@****; Fri, 21 Feb 92 06:12 CDT
Received: by UICVM (Mailer R2.07) id 3709; Fri, 21 Feb 92 06:15:38 CST
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 1992 14:38:26 CST
Reply-To: Gamemasters Interest Group <GMAST-L@*****.BITNET>
Sender: Gamemasters Interest Group <GMAST-L@*****.BITNET>
From: David Remington <indavidr@****.EDU>
Subject: Re: problem with the assault cannon...
X-To: uunet!uga.cc.uga.edu!GMAST-L%UTCVM.BITNET@*****.UU.NET
To: Brett Barnhart <BARNHART@****.BITNET>
In-Reply-To: <9202201804.AA16028@******.UU.NET>; from "Steve Wilcoxon" at
Feb
20, 92 10:58 am
The reason you can fire anti vehicular weapons at people in Shadowrun
is because the damage systems are set up so that a SS with good
equipment can soak up almost any amount of anti-personell weapons fire
you care to throw at them. I got fed up when my party started dropping
grenades at their feet to blow mobs off them and when the troll took an
assault cannon and walked away from it.....
There is a one-word answer: Cyberpunk
