From:	Chris Siebenmann <cks@********.UTCS.TORONTO.EDU>
Subject:	Re: SHADOWTALK: a response to inquiries on the shadowbabble
Date:	Mon, 12 Oct 92 19:22:41 -0400

| The shadowtalk that we are swapping here is for others to enjoy AND
| TO COMMENT ON.

We couldn't. We just said that.
Without your background, it was so much babble (heck, in my opinion
*with* the background it's still babble). Next time, just supply the
background.

Notice how the decker comments in all the published supplements have
background (what they're commenting on) and make points which add to
the presented background.

- cks