Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: The Reverend <IH46@****.BITNET>
Subject: AMEN!!
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 92 12:29:46 MDT
>
> I have to agree wit Woodsy... I haven't even /fantacized/ about hving that
> much Karma to play with. If you can only start with skill ratings of 6
> (or maybe it was just my GM, but if it was, more power to him!) it takes
> a LOT of Karma to get a skill of 13!
>
> 12 points to raise to a 7
...
> 126 KARMA POINTS!!!!
Hate to break this to you. It gets even worse under SR2... it takes 2
times what the skill is GOING to be in karma. Ouch.
>
> Sorry chummers, but when you talk about runners with Computer skill 13
> and Vehicle B/R 9 and Pig Latin 10 and Tricycle Piloting 8 ... I have
> GOT to wonder what kind of Karma Kandystore you've been running in. Cuz I'd
> /sure/ like to visit it someday!
Tell me about it. The only way I can get them that high is through
specializations and such. After I get a 7 or so in a skill, I work on
boosting my other skills, or getting new ones. One of my original
Riggers, who ran all the modules released in the first and a half. It
was a high karma/HIGH RISK! campaign. We went up against queens, toxics
and dragons (oh my!). He had a high score of an 8. Granted, he burned
a LOT of karma, but he also had several 6's or so (not bad for a guy
who started with priority 3 skills and never specialized or concentrate)
and his skill list ran off the room provided on the character sheet.
He was never played as a screw (well, depending on who you ask :), just
played effectively. It's all a matter of attitude.
>

---
The Reverend
"He told me of his strange foundation..."

Cthulhu in '92! Why vote for the lesser evil?
Looking for Alt.Cyberpunk.Chatsubo archives...e-mail if u have info!

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.