Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "Psuedo-Combat Mage" <KSDKW@******.BITNET>
Subject: Re: Why is Game Balance such a bad phrase?
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 92 23:35:26 -0900
> Hoi Kiddies;
> I have been reading these posts from various assorted people trying
> to explain why bioware should and should not hurt mages. I think I have
> seen all the hair-brained pseudo reasons for each side posted.
^^^^^^
>>>>>[First off do not take my name in vane (not all the ideas were mine
anyway
). Next, I would like to say that, that was a very nice and well thought out
post. However, you go on to say that 'if you don't like the rules to change
them'. Some groups may accept that....then you join a new group....they don't
accept it. Then, being the mage you are in this case, you have to make some
minor adjustments to your character. Which can be a pain in the but. Sure I
agree that it is game balance but it just doesn't sound right that ONLY mages
have essence taken off. In AD&D you can have mixed characters can you not?
Like a magic-user/fighter that can have the magic and the weapons/armor of a
fighter? So why couldn't I, a combat mage, have the same type of advantage?
It seems to be more then just a question of game balance but also what is fair.
Don't you think? I still want to hear more opinions on this.]<<<<<
--Psuedo <8:39:11/10-30-53>

||===================================================================
||Dave W. /Alias=Psuedo<Combat Mage Extrodinare>/ ||
|| ||
|| // He who hunts dragons too||
||KSDKW@****** // long becomes a dragon ||
||KSDKW@*****.ALASKA.EDU \ \ // himself. ||
||KSDKW@*****.ALASKA.EDU \ \ // Neitche ||
|| \ X/ ||
===================================================================||

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.