From:	The Reverend <IH46@****.BITNET>
Subject:	Re: sustained drain
Date:	Thu, 3 Dec 92 11:52:18 MST

> I do however go beyond the rules a bit, in that I require the mage to make
> willpower rolls vs other distractions to sustain a spell. For example, if a
This one makes sense! Hmmm... time to adopt it (after seeing our res-
ident crystal shaman hold obnoxious Turn To GOO spell forever) (and the
only thing grosser than watching this was watching our GM get around it
due to a totally-illegal orichalum bullet weapon foci [MUNCHKIN!])
>
> +2 for each spell maintained plus any modifiers for existing wounds.
Isn't that the regular rule?
>
> a) require that the mage allocate 1 die from their magic pool to sustaining
> a spell. Their T#s are high, and they have 1 less die to work with.
That fits in really good with SR rules... after all, you have to leave a
die behind from your control pool if you are silencing an IC.
>

--- "If character isn't an issue, why isn't
The Reverend Ted Kennedy President?"-Rush Limbaugh
"My employers have changed but the name remains"
all new .sig virus v.314159: Copy me! Works 99 times out of 1,000!