From:	"Dark Thought Publications." <JEK5313@*****.TAMU.EDU>
Subject:	Battle?? Did I sleep through it?!?!
Date:	Wed, 27 Jan 93 02:30:16 CET

Nightstalker:
]Well chummers,
] It seems this discussion just doesn't want to end. What do you all think?
]Should we go for another round?
] And Flare, I don't understand that comment you made about the Nightfox
]argument. Could you please explain.
] Waiting for Answers,
] Jason J Carter
] The Nightstalker


Another round??? I don't think she can handle anna more of that,
Captain!!!! Let's just call it the Mike Tyson fight, shall we?
What I was saying is that, if you accept the first part of the Nightfox
argument, namely that "a quickening is a spell," then it follows that the
latter half of it is not disproved. That's all. However, I was under the
impression that you _could_ cast a spell at another spell. Please correct me
if I'm wrong. Besides which, I do not understand quickenings to be "only" a
spell.


--Flare <NULLSIG COURTESY OF DOOM>

Dark Thought Publications & Doom Technologies, Inc.
>>> Working on solutions best left in the dark.