Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Doctor Doom <JCH8169@*****.TAMU.EDU>
Subject: RE: cty-910
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 93 19:48:32 CET
Scott Madaski:


Very well, mein Herr, you have expressed your rather bitter sentiments to the
participants of the list. However, given your rather acerbic statements I feel
motivated to clarify my position:

Did I ever refer to you as a Munchkin? No.

Did I ever accuse you of Power Gaming? No.

Did I ever insult you personally? No.

I, for one, attacked your statements, not you.

I expressed my sentiments in opposition to your proposal. My statement merely
claimed that it would not work under the rules, no more. I itemized and
enumerated upon the infractions your proposed cyberdeck as per the rules for
support of my claim, and yet you claim there was no need. I am of the opinion
that there was, indeed, considerable need: You purported to be operating
within the latitude of the regulations--I endeavored to prove your claim
erroneous, citing rules & page numbers.

Despite this, and rather than defending yourself, you direct myself and the
other members of this list to equestrian fornication. Instead of proceeding
along a rational course, you lower yourself to the depths of inane swearing
coupled with juvenile name-calling; a decidedly immature response, and one
that belies considerable hypocrisy on your part, taking into account your
accusations as to the creative and intellectual quality of this list's
correspondence.

Moreover, your asinine statements aside, the fact remains that your cyberdeck
IS guilty of numerous rule violations; a fact you have been unable to
successfully challenge.


Colonel Count von Hohenzollern und von Doom, DMSc, DSc, PhD.

Doom Technologies & Weapon Systems -- Dark Thought Publications
>>> Working on solutions best left in the dark.
<<<
[ Doctor Doom : jch8169@********.tamu.edu ]

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.