Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Christina Johnson <johnson1@**.UWP.EDU>
Subject: Re: shadowtalk (fwd)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 93 18:31:18 CET
Ok guys... I do hate to be a bitch, but the last time I compiled this
list it took about five times longer than it should have because I had to
edit people's postings, and then they would send me three or four notes
regarding changes they wanted made that they had remembered after their
initial sending. Since I'm going to get several hundred character
discriptions sent to me, most likely, I'd rather not have to go through
and change the format of each one.

The character below is the format that the character discriptions should
follow. Of the postings I've recieved just today, only one person got the
format right. (this is not a flame, i repeat, this is not a flame...
well, maybe it is. I dunno) Anyway, what with school and work and family
and all that, I'm going to have to say that I'll only include postings
that follow this format. (Minor mistakes will, of course, be ignored, but
wild variations on a theme have become common occurance.)

And Please: A MAX of five lines in the body of the description.

Thanks a lot, and I really hope I don't sound to horrible. I'm doing this
because I enjoy it, after all. No one told me I HAD to...


DOA:
16 year old human decker. Her origins are a little fuzzy, and she is
in reality only about 11 years old, but she is a vat job. Born of an
experiment gone bad involving Fuchi and a spin-off company called
Precision, DOA (Otherwise known as Sierra) has several abilities that
'normal' deckers do not. Her major disadvantage is a lack of experience.
(Chris Johnson)



Thanks.

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Christina M. Johnson, University of Wisconsin, Parkside
johnson1@**.uwp.edu
I know the darkness that I may recognize the light.
``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.