From:	"Chad S. Mawson" <csm2747@************.EDU>
Subject:	Ammo
Date:	Wed, 21 Apr 1993 12:33:39 CDT

Reply-To: ROBERSON@***.EDU

> One Question: When you say that the victim of a Napalm Gel round only has
> armor to resist the attack, what is your reasoning? An why did you say that?
> What else would I be wearing besides my armor. Unless you mean the obvious
> fact that Combat Pool can't be used.
>
> J Roberson

Your right, it was late and I wasn't thinking clearly. I guess I meant no
Combat Pool. Anyway, besides that, what do you think?

+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+
| Chad Mawson *-* History Major, Nebraska Weseleyan University *-* |
| Internet e-mail: csm2747@******.nebrwesleyan.edu Lincoln, Nebraska |
| |
|-> 12. A sucking chest wound is Nature's way of telling you to slow down. <- |
+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+