Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "Dark Thought Publications." <JEK5313@*****.TAMU.EDU>
Subject: Re: Black Book martial arts. (fwd)
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1993 09:49:01 -0500
As requested, here is the forwarded message. . .

From: "P. Steele" <P.C.Steele@*********.ac.uk>
Message-Id: <AA11117.199304212235@****.ncl.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Black Book martial arts.
To: JEK5313@*****.TAMU.EDU
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 93 23:35:27 BST
In-Reply-To: <199304211832.AA16121@*******.ncl.ac.uk>; from "Dark Thought
Publications." at Apr 21, 93 12:20 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]


Ethan Court wrote (as a P.S. to his main post)

> (ob-Shadowrun-screw: Last time I tell a character that he can start a sammi
> with "no more than wired 2." He ended up getting that, plus a softlink-4,
> cyber mag 3, smartlink, and every freakin non-active chip in the book. Teach
> me to try to lessen the work for me. . . )
>
>
> And, whilst on the back of that particular animal, how does anyone, if
> they do, make the cyber mag3-smartlink combo less of a screw?

Well one way round it is to adopt the pseudo rules for combat pools which I
posted a while ago <god I'm pissed, I've just hit delete key 15 or so times>.
This effectively uses different TN's for dodging and negates the advantage of
mag 3. On a more practical note, cause many people (inlcuding the dark lord on
high) don't agree with that method you can always insist that changing the
focus on the eyes takes up a free action. So if in one action a sam tries to
shoot at two oppoents 1 at short range and 1 at long range (for eg) you then
clobber him with the new TN. <God I really am pissed. But it is thoroughly
recommended. Go to a real ale festival then come and real your mail at
11:30 pm>

The Powerhouse

--
Phillip Steele |
|
P.C.Steele@***.ac.uk |

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.