Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Jayson Mackie <Jayson_Mackie@*******.GEN.NZ>
Subject: Re: Vision Maginfication. . .
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1993 18:58:13 +1200
In a message dated Tue 29 Jun 93 12:31, Chris Yang <cyang@*****.UBC.CA>
wrote:

CYU> We (me and my players) have always found the idea of using vision
CYU> mag
CYU> in combat completely ludicrous. There is no way that anybody can
CYU> hold a gun steady enough to shoot a target at long range as well as
CYU> they can at short range.
CYU> As a house rule, we do not allow the use of vision mag to reduce
CYU> range penalties unless the shooter is braced/prone/aiming.

I have always thought of the smartgun link as putting a cross hair on the
users field of vision, you put the cross hair where you want to shoot and
the feedback circuits in the arm and gun bring the weapon to bare.

I did not mind my players using this idea although my NPC tended to get
shot up. To remedy this I have brought some new house rules into play
in a campain I have recently started.
1. I use vision modifiers pretty freely, and I have a weather table I use.
(As a side note has any one posted a table like this with factual
Knowledge, mine was a guessamate only, drizzly misty fairly cold,
based on the fact I come from a costal town about the same degrees
south)

2. Every range you bring the target in reduces your Combat pool by 2 dice
due to reduced field of vision and increased concentration etc. The
gunner just cannot be as aware of his/her surroundings. (Tactical comp.
probably negates or reduces this but I have never had to deal with one.)

Something to discuss anyways.
Mak.


-- Via DLG Pro v0.999

Mak.

This thought was all my own, I'm so proud!

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.