Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "Dylan Norhtup (PHY)" <norhtup@*****.CAS.USF.EDU>
Subject: Re: multiple cyberdecks
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1993 22:48:28 -0400
On Mon, 19 Jul 1993, Richard Pieri wrote:

> You can't. Here's why:

Say that to Edison, Tesla, Hawking, or any of a number of great minds that
push forward and do that which cannot be done. (Sorry that's my usual
response to those words.)

> A cyberdeck is a special combination of micro-supercomputer and simsense
> rig. That's the rub; your brain can only deal with one set of signals at a
> time. The cyberdeck's simrig overrides your natural inputs, putting your
> brain into a virtual reality. If you have two cyberdecks competing for your
> brain, either one would cancel the input of the other, or they'd both
> totally confuse the shit out of you. In either case it is impossible to
> handle two decks simultaneously.

You can. Here's why.

The only simsense signal to deal with would be the one from the Dummy
deck. It would be feeding it's signal to the second deck much the same
way that the Matrix feeds it's signal to the Dummy deck in the first
place. Whoever first said that a simple router would be simpler, cheaper and
easier was entirely correct. However that does not mean that cyberdecks
cannot be used as very expensive routers. Just make a few mods (which any
technomancer worth his silicon could do with his eyes closed) and off you go.

Doc X

****************************************************************************
* Witty Remark * Dylan Northrup <norhtup@*****.cas.usf.edu> * This space *
* Here * (Yeah I know they spelled my name wrong) * for rent *
****************************************************************************
"When I was younger, so much younger than today
I never needed anybody's help in any way" -- The Bealtes 'Help'

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.