Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Robert Watkins <bob@**.NTU.EDU.AU>
Subject: Re: CPU Controllers
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1993 17:18:02 +0930
Just a few quick statements, about some replies to my post on CPU controllers:
A decker with a high Hacking pool, and a brilliant deck, should be able to do
stuff really well. Most systems are open to a good decker. My post reflected
this.
I was trying to emulate something that would be the case in RL, and is ruled
out by the SR rules. That is: the CPU controls EVERYTHING. If the system can do
something, then the CPU can ask it to do it. In some cases a SPU will be
sitting in the way, but all this means is that you've got another place ot make
the request from. Under standard SR rules, to control a camera, you have to be
in it's Slave node, to control the lifts, you have to be in that node, etc. Yet
you should be able to do it from the CPU. Frames should not be required, as the
system operators don't need frames.

Thanks for the comments. I did appreciate them, and that's why I felt I had to
respond.

--
Robert Watkins
bob@******.cs.ntu.edu.au
************ It wouldn't be luck if you could get out of life alive. ***********

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.