Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Richard Pieri <ratinox@***.NEU.EDU>
Subject: Re: Earthdawn (My Comments)
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1993 12:53:19 EDT
>>>>> "R" == RJR96326 <RJR96326@****.UTULSA.EDU> writes:

R> You see, I was hoping that FASA would introduce continuity with
R> Shadowrun, not only in the 4th/5th/6th world bit, but the game
R> mechanics.

From the background, Shadowrun mechanics wouldn't quite work very
well, pretty much because every PC is some kind of Adept, either
physical, spellcasting, or several others (including the Beastmaster!
:-). The other thing is that the target market for Earthdawn is a less
experienced gamer.

R> To me, the simplifiedgame mechanics of Shadowrun, where only one
R> die is used, is beautiful.

Actually, there are many instances where more than one die is rolled.
First, if your "step" rating is high enough, you may roll two or more
dice and add their totals. Second, if you roll the highest value you
can on a die (ie, a "10" on a d10) you re-roll that die and add that
to the total (this is a bonus die, much like rolling a 10 or 20 in
TORG). Speaking of TORG, Earthdawn's primary authors also were the
primary authors of TORG.

There is, so far, one definite continuity, that being the reference to
oricalcum, the magical alloy. I haven't finished reading the book yet,
so I can't say much more about that. Also, 5 of the 8 PC races are the
same as Shadowrun: Human, Elf, Ork, Troll, Dwarf; the new races are
Obsidiman, T'skrang, and Windling.

More later.

Rat <ratinox@***.neu.edu> Northeastern's Stainless Steel Rat
PGP Public Key Block available upon request Ask about rat-pgp.el v1.61
||||| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||
History shows again and again/How nature points up the folly of men
--Blue Oyster Cult, Godzilla

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.