Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: IAN <JHURLEY1@******.BITNET>
Subject: Re: Corp. Shadowfiles
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1993 21:16:29 -0400
>Dividends won't make you rich, but 'runners are in a position to have
>inside information. As in: the new product Renraku has been promising
>for six months is likely to be delayed, because someone kidnapped
>the head of research for that product... Fuchi's control of this
>market niche appears to be safe for now.
>
>Inside information can strongly affect market price. It can pay a
>'runner to hang onto a stock until the market learns what he already
>knows.
>
>Of course, inside information is worth money in itself, since it can
>be sold to people in a position to buy more stocks (or options!) than
>you can.
>
>Quincunx

This brings up another possibility for shadowruns->ones to affect
the performance of a particular stock. 'Raku could send a group (or
groups) of shadowrunners to mess up an Aztech project(s) to scr*w Aztech's
stock price. The price of a company's stock directly influences a company's
ability to raise money for expansion, new products, etc...
*************
The Shadowfiles note this, and point it out as a possibility for a hook
for a shadowrun. What I had failed to note in the review, was that the book
was mainly concerned with explaining WHY shadowruns occur, and how a GM
can use this in their game.
************

An artifically low stock price can really throw a wrench into the
works if done at the right time. A stock price that is far too low for the
value of a company could also make that company ripe for a takeover. This
might not be much of a concern for a megacorp, but might be a worry for a
smaller corp.
************************
Yep!
*************************



I still don't have much more to add to the review as yet. Sorry I didn't post
it here originally, as well as on usenet news.

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.