Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Joshua James Harrison <harrij4@***.EDU>
Subject: Re: Blind Deckers?
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 1994 15:18:03 -0500
Hmm... I just leaped into this discussion, and I don't really know what's being
debated, but I'll take a stab in the dark... are we discussing whether a blind
person could be a decker? If they would be able to "see" the Matrix?

I would say that it depends on how/why the person is blind... if they are
blind due to damage to the eye, or a problem with the eye itself, then there
shouldn't be any reason that they wouldn't be able to see the Matrix, because
the part of the brain that processes visual information is still good - it
just isn't receiving any information from the eye... the neural link can be
connected to the visual center of the brain, generating the images there
(which I think is how the whole set-up works anyhow).

OTOH... if the problem lies in the brain, and that it can't process the visual
information (I've never heard of a situation like that, but it doesn't mean
that it can't happen), then I really don't know what could be done... beats
me...

Of course, all of this may have already been said... so forgive me if I've
repeated any ideas. As I said, I don't really know what's being discussed
here... oh well... until next time...


--
Josh Harrison | A Elbereth Gilthoniel | "The Hedgehog"
aka A.M. Hawke | o menel palan-diriel, | \ \ | / /
Internet: | le nallon si di'nguruthos! | \ \ | / /
harrij4@***.edu | A tiro nin, Fanuilos! | --- O O ---
------------------------------------------------------------| / C \
'Now come, you filth!' he cried. 'You've hurt my master, | / m\_/m \
you brute, and you'll pay for it. We're going on; but we'll |---------------
settle with you first. Come on, and taste it again!' - Sam, "The Two Towers"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GE/T/O d++(--) -p+ c+(++) l u e+ m+(-) s+/ !n h f+(*) !g w+@ t+@ r(+) y?

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.