Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Koert Vynckier <kvynckir@***.VUB.AC.BE>
Subject: Re: Blind Mages (was: Dual-nature question)
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 1994 09:28:36 MET
>
> In response to Koert Vynckier:
> ]
> ] >
> ] > >
> ] > > Since when can a blind mage see astrally ?
>
> Since forever.
>
> ] > To my knowledge a mage loses his magic if he/she/it loses his/her/its eyes.
> ] > This is supported by the background of an NPC former mage in Eye Witness
> ] > (7316)
> ] > who had cut out his eyes so he would never again see what he had seen on the
> ] > > astral plane when he attempted to leave the biosphere.
>
> And I would point to a counter example by FASA in the module
> Elven Fire. While I personally have not seen the character write
> up, the GM who is running the module has describe her in great
> detail, including her Clairvoyance (Zero Range) spell.

Yes
But can she cast spells for which you need to see ??? I mean LOS - range spells
To my knowledge Clairvoyance can't be used to cast spells at someone
cfr. Jesse, Toxic Shaman from the adventure with NAN1.

If I get you right, she could in astral space.

>
> ] > Since Physical damage on the astral plane results in Physical damage to the
> ] > physical body, it would seem only logical that the reverse is also true.
> ] > So if you lose your physical eyes, you lose your astral eyes and the ability
> ] > to cast spells (for which you must be able to see).
>
> The astral plane is a separate reality based upon emotions. People
> without eyes in the real world adapt their other senses and continue
> to function.

Adapt their senses??
To quote from "Jennifer 8" : "Only in bad movies"

> I would argue the same can be said for those who wish
> to function on the astral plane- except rather than rely upon hearing
> and touch, they rely upon more emotive senses/traits.
>
>
> Da Minotaur
>
So, can they function as effectively as peolpe who can see ?

Night Owl

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.