Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Nightfox <DJWA@******.UCC.NAU.EDU>
Subject: Re: Anarchy in the Streets
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 1994 15:58:08 -0700
>Alex Shearer wrote:
>>I'd prefer that Lonestar stays.
>
>Gotta agree with that... It doesn't really matter who wins the contract -
>there'll still be extractions, etc. to be done, but Lone Star still has the
>contract in the official FASA gameworld, don't they, so if we wanna kinda stick
>to FASA's world, we may as well keep LS.
>
>On the other hand, perhaps people don't want to stick to FASA's world, and want
>to go on and create one of our own...

The problem is - Do you want to be the one to edit the FAQ everyttime something
changes in the world and then keep on telling the newbie's that "no Lone Star
lost the contract for Seattle back in '55 to KE" This is why we don't change
things - there is too much turn over.

>As a matter of interest, do the guys at FASA read these lists, and if so, do
>they use any of the plots, etc. in building the world?

To my knowledge FASA does not have anyone reading the Shadowtk stuff, they are
lacking in the Internet connection department.

>I know that they ask for GMs to send in the results of games, etc., so that
>they can be incorporated into the news sheets that sometimes go into
>adventures...

I met the guy once who was in on the Aztec (or who ever) Helicarrier Crash.


BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!
Daniel Waisley + SCA - March of Ered Sul - Flagstaff AZ
DJWA@******.UCC.NAU.EDU + Nau fencing club.
"Nightfox" + Brotherhood of the Cryptic Demesne -household
BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!
GE - d+(-) -p+@ c++(++++) !L u(--) e+(*) m+ s+/ !n+(-) h* f+ g+ w+++ t+ r+ y+
"infinity = zero" - Daniel Waisley "Nightfox"
BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!BOINGEE!!!

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.