Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Doc_X <northrup@*****.CAS.USF.EDU>
Subject: Re: your mail
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 1994 12:50:42 -0400
On Thu, 28 Apr 1994, Unix_Kurs7044 wrote:

> Subject: Night`s Pawn
>
> I really didn`t like this one, for one single reason: The main
> character (Church, I think is his name) IS IN FACT A MUNCHKIN PLAYER.
> He has got dozens of different SINs, hundreds of Friends in thousands
> of countries, millions of Nuyen and, finally, whizz cyberware. When
> players read this novel they might get the idea to create an equal
> character. And this results in munchkin players. So Night's Pawn gives
> a bad inspiration to people.
> And the Church goes on vendetta, destroying a whole Policlub and
> Lofwyr's brother !!! I told my players that this novel is not part of
> my SR-Universe. There's so much potential in Lofwyr's brother that I
> can`t understand why they (FASA-Authors) kill him after they
> introduced him!

I thought Church was a good example of a character who was a real old
shadowrunner. He is definitely NPC material. If a player wants to have
a character like Church as a beginning character, I wouldn't say "no", I'd
say "Hello no!"

It was my understanding that Lofwyr's brother escaped. He was bacly
scarred and definitely on the losing end of the stick, but he got away.

Doc X
*****************************************************************************
* Dylan Northrup <northrup@*****.cas.usf.edu> * I'm not a computer genius *
*********************************************** I just play one in the lab *
* "...And I should have thought of that before I did you wrong" -- Yaz *
*****************************************************************************

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.