Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Darth Vader <j07c@***.UNI-BREMEN.DE>
Subject: Re: A debate from Tucson
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 1994 16:07:18 +0200
> >> I argued that 6 was the average joe, but 9 is someone exceptional
> >> (Einstein, Carl Lewis, Ghandi,etc).
> Stephane> It says in the book that a stat of 3 is average, not 6.
>
> According to the book, "average" is 3, and NORMAL (emphasis mine) human
> maximum is 6. I read that just like I do normal characteristic maxima in
> Hero: it's the maximum that an otherwise normal human being can achieve
> without seriously extensive and difficult work. In Hero an Olympic-class
> weightlifter might have a Strength of 23-25; in Shadowrun he'd have a
> Strength of around 9-10.

I agree with the '6 was the average joe' view. Now I know what the
rules say and I choose to interpret it this way. There are two kinds of
people in the world - especially in the SR universe. People who achive things
and people who dont. The great majority of people really do have attributes
that tend to concentrate around 3 - they are average after all - but people
who make a difference (this deffinitely includes runners) have much
higher attributes. After all they are the elite, the best humanity has to
offer (I like being modest :). So these people, that are really good at what
they do should have stats that reflect this - a 6 means the best you can do
without being exceptional. People with stats higher than 6 are exceptional
even by runner standards - they are true legands.

--
"Believe in Angels." -- The Crow

GCS d>- H s+: !g p? !au a- w+ v-(?) C+++ UA++VS++L>++++ P-- (aren't we all?)
L+>+++ 3 E--- N++ K W(+)(---) M-- !V(--) -po+(---) Y+ t++ 5+ !j(-) R+++(--)
!G tv(++) b+++ D++ B- e+ u++(-) h*(+) f+ r- n!(----) y?

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.