From:	Damion Milliken <u9467882@***.EDU.AU>
Subject:	Re: Thermographics and Improved Invisibility
Date:	Thu, 27 Oct 1994 19:36:13 +1000

Sinbad Sam writes:

> >While I am rather partial to a "notice-me-not" type spell, I don't
think
> >(Improved) Invisibility is this type of spell.
>
> Yes improved invisiblity is this type of spell. Fasa.support@*****.gies.com

Ah, so this is a FASA (no $) clarification. Well it seems like it is a
pretty contradictory one to me, but oh well, that's FASA for you.

Shadowdancer writes:

> I thought you were refering to the ultraviolet spectrum of seeing,
> myself. And no, I personally despise the 1st ed rules by the
> unmentionable. But what of sonic stunners? Would a device that
> produced soundwaves to stun someone effectivly blind a person(or
> paranormal) using ultravision?

Would that not depend on the frequency of the sound? If the frequency of
the stunner corresponded to the frequency of detection, then the person
attempting to "see" would be overwhealmed and wind up blinded. Better check
that explanation with the physics geeks around here though.

--
Damion Milliken University of Wollongong e-mail: u9467882@***.edu.au

(GEEK CODE 2.1) GE -d+(d) H s++:-- !g p? !au a18 w+ v(?) C+(++) US++ P? L !3 E?
N K- W+ M@ !V po@ Y(+) t+ !5 !j R+(++) G(+)('') !tv(--)@ b++ D+
B? e+ u@ h* f(+) !r n--(----) !y+