Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "Wesley W. Walker" <wwalker@****.UARK.EDU>
Subject: Re: mage-heavy games (was your mail)
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 1994 11:29:17 -0600
On Thu, 17 Nov 1994, Stainless Steel Rat wrote:
> Exqueeze me? Maybe in your games you're mage heavy, but that doesn't make
> it true for the rest of us. Some of us do play things other than mages.

Err... It wasn't my problem.. read the previous post that I
included? My adventures are mage *LIGHT*. Mages are a lot easier to
kill in other RPGs, with none of the shields and garbage that SR give
their mages.. (In my own RPG, I *think* that I've finally got the ropes
on the mage..)

> Some examples from my past: the rigger surveillance/espionage expert, the
> physical adept Sinanju assassin, the biotech/biogenetic researcher who had
> herself turned into a "bio-samurai" to hunt down the terrorists who raped
> her (she was neat, actually, and allergic to the metals used in cyber-
> neural linkages so the GM allowed me to take cultured biotech instead...
> ever see an Elf with a Charisma of 3?:). In all, to date, I have played
> exactly /one/ full mage, and she was a Snake shaman (combat spells? You
> gotta be kidding).

Though your character concepts are pretty interesting, the fact
still remains that Magic is rather unbalanced in SR. If a mage don't
wanna get hurt, he won't get hurt.. unless another mage can fight him.
So I really can't see the relevance of this response? =)

Heheheh... And I've seen some Elves with some pretty crappy
charismas. I'm even playin one in a PBeM. =) It's all snide remarks and
pretty (oops... I mean petty ;) ) fun.

\||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||/
- Wes W. Walker (wwalker@****.uark.edu) * "...in large, friendly letters -
- CSCI Major and General Slave * were the words 'DON'T PANIC'." -
- Artiste Wanna-be (accepting donations)* -Hitch Hiker's Guide -
/||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||\

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.