Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Martin Steffens <BDI05626@***.RHIJ.NL>
Subject: Re: Minimum Body
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 1995 18:18:20 +0100
> Datum verzending: Fri, 3 Feb 1995 16:05:58 -0400
> Stuur antw. aan: Discussion of the Fantasy game ShadowRun
<SHADOWRN@***.SURFnet.nl>
> Van: pran r mukherjee <pran@*****.UMICH.EDU>
> Onderwerp: Re: Minimum Body
> Aan: Multiple recipients of list SHADOWRN
<SHADOWRN@***.SURFnet.nl>

On Fri, 3 Feb, pran r mukherjee wrote:

> I hate to point this out, but it tends to really suck. Say you had
> Joe-Bob, strength 3. He shoots a predator, power 9. He has a plus 3
> recoil because you rarely put recoil comp. on a pistol. By your rules,
> only people with strength 5 or more would even be able to shoot a
> pistol without penalties.

Forgot to tell that when using a weapon in two hands the strenght is
doubled, sorry for that.

[some stuff deleted]
> where you aimed. The reason that it's single shot is that you use the
> extra simple action to pull the barrel back into line with the target.
> No matter how much recoil comp you put on it, it WILL move. It is a
> cannon after all. Now, as for knockback, that may be a different story.

Where is that in the rules: the simple action to put your barrel back
into line? I just invented this rule to make sure that the weaker
characters can not just fire everything.

Tried the knock-back rule this weekend and I'm going to use it; it
works just fine :)

Thanks for the comment,

Martin



**********************************************************************
Martin Steffens |"If don't want your enemies to know your secrets
E-mail: | don't tell them to your friends"
bdi05626@***.rhij.nl | Arab saying
**********************************************************************

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.