Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject: Re: New spell, comments?
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 1995 16:34:58 +0200
>The spell will last for as long as you specify using a Temporal Link, or if
>you do not specify a Temporal Link, then you must sustain the spell. But
>yes, after it runs out, you need to put the spell back into it again (but
>the enchanting operation to make the weapon a suitable receptical for the
>Anchoring only needs to be done once).

I hadn't noticed this before. Thanks for pointing it out...

>> Who has just noticed that the nomination has gone through. So who presented
>> the award?
>
>No one, Gurth said I should change it to "Unofficial", rather than
>"Nominee", so I did. [Didn't you see that in one of his posts?]

I just thought it would look better than keeping the "Nominee for" bit...


>Well, I'd like to thank my Mum, and my Dad, and my cat Snoffy, and my
>goldfish Bubbles,
^^^^^^^

Do they have Most Wanted in Australia too? :)


Gurth@******.nl - Gurth@***.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
he's not trying to catch your eye; he's just trying to get a life
Geek Code v2.1: GS/AT/! -d+ H s:- !g p?(3) !au a>? w+(+++) v*(---) C+(++) U
P? !L !3 E? N++ K- W+ -po+(po) Y+ t(+) 5 !j R+(++)>+++$ tv+(++) b+@ D+(++)
B? e+ u+@ h! f--(?) !r(--)(*) n---->!n y? Unofficial Shadowrun Guru :)

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.