From: | Gurth <gurth@******.NL> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: New spell, comments? |
Date: | Sat, 8 Apr 1995 16:34:58 +0200 |
>you do not specify a Temporal Link, then you must sustain the spell. But
>yes, after it runs out, you need to put the spell back into it again (but
>the enchanting operation to make the weapon a suitable receptical for the
>Anchoring only needs to be done once).
I hadn't noticed this before. Thanks for pointing it out...
>> Who has just noticed that the nomination has gone through. So who presented
>> the award?
>
>No one, Gurth said I should change it to "Unofficial", rather than
>"Nominee", so I did. [Didn't you see that in one of his posts?]
I just thought it would look better than keeping the "Nominee for" bit...
>Well, I'd like to thank my Mum, and my Dad, and my cat Snoffy, and my
>goldfish Bubbles,
^^^^^^^
Do they have Most Wanted in Australia too? :)
Gurth@******.nl - Gurth@***.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
he's not trying to catch your eye; he's just trying to get a life
Geek Code v2.1: GS/AT/! -d+ H s:- !g p?(3) !au a>? w+(+++) v*(---) C+(++) U
P? !L !3 E? N++ K- W+ -po+(po) Y+ t(+) 5 !j R+(++)>+++$ tv+(++) b+@ D+(++)
B? e+ u+@ h! f--(?) !r(--)(*) n---->!n y? Unofficial Shadowrun Guru :)