From:	Damion Milliken <adm82@***.EDU.AU>
Subject:	Re: Phys-ads
Date:	Wed, 19 Apr 1995 11:50:41 +1000

Philip Hayward writes:

> > 1) More phys adepts will be HTH specialists than will not be
> True enough but then there are still alot of sams who specialise in HTH

Granted.

> I've found that it can be fairly even if both sam and phys-ad are
> specialised.

Nup. I still contend that. But ask us (Bob, Jani & I) in a few days and
we'll tell you the results of our "test".

> Specialising has its disadvantages most GM's I know will put people
> against there weaknesses. So the versatile can overcome this more easily.
> A specialist HTH will end up in more gunfights or negotitions in our game.
> Not that I wont give them what they want it's just we can't let them have it
> all their own way. :)

<grin> Yep, that's entirely right. <evil GM grin>

--
Damion Milliken University of Wollongong E-mail: adm82@***.edu.au

(GEEK CODE 2.1) GE -d+@ H s++:-- !g p0 !au a19 w+ v(?) C++ US++>+++ P+ L !3
E? N K- W M@ !V po@ Y+ t+ 5 !j R+(++) G(+)('''') !tv(--@)
b++ D B? e+$ u@ h* f+ !r n----(--)@ !y+